Home
로그인
회원가입
학습 콘텐츠
Loading...
Amazon Just OBLITERATED 600,000 Careers - Video học tiếng Anh
듣기 연습
듣기 연습
/
Video
/
The Infographics Show
/
Amazon Just OBLITERATED 600,000 Careers
Amazon Just OBLITERATED 600,000 Careers
학습 모드 선택:
자막 보기
단어 선택
단어 다시 쓰기
Highlight:
3000 Oxford Words
4000 IELTS Words
5000 Oxford Words
3000 Common Words
1000 TOEIC Words
5000 TOEFL Words
자막 (230)
0:00
6 a.m. You wake up, apply for a job… and get rejected before your coffee’s even ready.
0:06
Not by a human… but by an algorithm that decided your future in seconds. You tweak your CV, rewrite
0:12
your cover letter, hit send again… and again… and again. Hundreds of applications. Hundreds of “we
0:19
were impressed…” followed by “unfortunately…” At first, you blame yourself… maybe you’re
0:24
not good enough. But what if the problem isn’t you at all? What if the system is
0:28
filtering you out before anyone ever sees your name? Because landing your first job
0:32
isn’t just hard… it’s fundamentally broken. I'm Josh and on today's episode of The
0:36
Infographics Show, we're explaining how the entry level job is dead.
0:41
Millions of people are opening rejection after rejection and realizing the brutal truth. It’s
0:45
not about education. It’s not about age, or desired pay, or location or culture.
0:51
Instead, they’ve become victims of the “Experience Paradox.”
0:54
Companies don’t care about school. They want… time, and they want 3 to 5 years of it.
0:59
Therein lies the paradox. Entry-level by definition is not mid-level.
1:04
It’s a classic Catch-22. They want someone experienced for an entry-level job,
1:08
but they won’t give you a chance to get that experience. So how are you supposed to get hired?
1:13
This is becoming the norm in the western world. The current data shows that in the US,
1:17
around 60% of entry-level job offers in industries like IT, marketing,
1:22
or finance all want years of experience… but they aren’t willing to train anyone.
1:27
As an unhappy job seeker wrote on Reddit: “What happened to growing into your role?”
1:32
That’s how economic mobility works. Without it, you’ll get millions of young people stuck at the
1:37
bottom of the corporate ladder with no way up. 20 years ago, economic mobility made sense.
1:42
But 20 years is a long time… and a lot has changed.
1:46
More than ever, hiring managers now think about risk when reading your applications…
1:50
or more likely, when their AI systems read your applications. They’re not thinking about training.
1:55
They’re predicting viability, how fast you can be doing something to enhance their bottom line.
2:00
They’re looking for a sweet spot: Too young, not enough experience means high risk. Too old,
2:05
too much experience, and you’re too expensive, too desperate, or too stubborn.
2:09
As another person wrote on Reddit: “You literally can't win.”
2:13
What companies are ideally looking for is young, experienced but not
2:16
too experienced plug-and-play workers. As a recruitment specialist said in an interview,
2:21
employees must now “hit the ground running.” In other words, the first rung of the employment
2:26
ladder has been ripped away. It’s currently smoldering on the bonfire of progress.
2:31
And it’s not just in the US. In the UK, StandoutCV.com
2:34
looked at almost 49,000 advertisements comprising “43 popular entry-level jobs.”
2:40
51.3% of those jobs wanted experience with an average of 2.7 years. How is
2:46
that even possible when you’re starting out? One of the only solutions is internships.
2:51
These days, students sometimes find themselves interning for months at a time, even a year or
2:56
more. They sometimes take on two or even three different positions. According to Forbes,
3:00
when it comes to predicting how someone will perform in an entry-level job, education,
3:04
references and interviews were much less reliable than performance in an internship. The article
3:10
said hiring managers are, quote, “desperate to avoid” lions on the CV and cats on the job.
3:16
But who can really afford to work for free? Not everyone is blessed with a safety net.
3:21
Nonetheless, without an internship, you’re stuck. Back in the 1980s,
3:25
only 3% of Americans did internships. Today, it’s closer to 50%.
3:30
And if you do an internship, you’re likely to get a job afterward… at least,
3:34
that used to be the case. But what about the other 50%?
3:37
Where do they fit in? That’s why critics have been calling
3:40
internships unethical and unfair. Privileged students with resources fare much better in the
3:45
landscape of job hunting and it’s not always about intelligence, skills or dedication.
3:50
If you’re enjoying this breakdown of why getting your first job is nearly impossible… make sure to
3:55
like, share and subscribe. It won’t fix the problem, but it helps the channel.
3:59
So, with the bottom rung now taken away, and internships now one of the only ways to
4:03
jump up the ladder, some young people are being “locked out” of corporate careers.
4:07
But the fact is, even with an internship, these days there’s no hard guarantee you’ll land a job.
4:13
Because entry-level jobs are disappearing fast. For US graduates aged 22 to 27, unemployment is
4:19
now 5.7%, well above the overall 4.4% rate. And 40% of those graduates that are in work,
4:26
are doing jobs that don’t even require a university degree.
4:30
Right now, aspiring to a white-collar job… isn’t a great idea
4:34
But it’s going to get worse. The reality is a lot of firms are currently in
4:38
the process of removing most of their entry-level positions. Part of the problem is outsourcing.
4:43
What’s the point in hiring an entry-level American IT worker for between $36,000 and
4:48
$66,000 a year… when you can outsource the same work to someone in India or Vietnam, someone
4:54
experienced who can hit the ground running? What would you do, if you owned a business?
4:58
In 2024, Forbes, writing about outsourcing in the US, said that 37% of small businesses outsource
5:04
at least one IT process. It isn’t going away.
5:08
By 2029, global IT outsourcing is expected to grow by $812.7 billion. The same article said
5:15
that right now, “66% of U.S. companies outsource at least one department.”
5:20
That means something like 300,000 American jobs are being outsourced every year.
5:25
If the foreign worker can speak English well and has some very basic software,
5:30
they’re ready to go. Skilled. Experienced. Hardworking. Low-maintenance. Helping to
5:34
achieve 24-hour productivity. It’s symbiotic perfection.
5:38
They’re hired through a third party, they usually aren’t covered by U.S. employment law. They’re
5:43
employed under the vendor’s local rules. But for young Americans who want to get on the employment
5:49
ladder, outsourcing means more competition. Globalization might work for owners and
5:53
investors but not always for the humble worker. Sure, it might mean you as a consumer receive
5:58
goods and services at a lower price, but for many, that’s not a great trade-off.
6:03
That said, for smaller businesses, outsourcing might be a matter of survival. Need a website?
6:08
A logo? Some video editing or digital marketing and the global freelancer pool might very well
6:14
work in your favor. Outsourcing can help companies get off the ground,
6:17
and better off the ground than a non-starter because you might expand and hire more people.
6:22
But does Big Tech need to outsource so much? The same Big Tech that has recently been
6:27
issuing Return to Office (RTO) orders to aggrieved American staff. About 46% of corporate employees
6:34
who received those orders said they were going to quit. But it turned out that in surveys, 53% of
6:41
companies said they secretly hoped many of their staff would leave, what’s known as “quiet firing.”
6:47
Why? Well, they didn’t need them, but didn’t
6:50
want to go through the hassle of letting them go. Yet according to Gallup in 2023, at least 50% of
6:55
the U.S. workforce was “quiet quitting”, meaning doing the bare minimum knowing they’d be fired. In
7:01
the UK, Gallup said 90% of staff were not engaged with their jobs on their way to quiet quitting.
7:07
But now many of the jobs don’t even exist. They wanted to quit in a time of plenty.
7:12
And those days are over. The companies hold all the cards.
7:15
Either they can outsource your job… or they can hire someone who is willing
7:18
to put in 24-hour shifts, never takes a day off, and very rarely makes a mistake.
7:23
Artificial Intelligence is the new golden child at the office. It’s the
7:27
main reason so many entry-level jobs are going or will go, not outsourcing.
7:32
In 2024, 804 hiring managers at corporate firms were asked some questions about AI. 78% said
7:39
their company expected to reduce hiring of recent graduates because of it. Some said there’d just be
7:44
small cuts, maybe only around 3 to 10% of staff. But others saw carnage coming down the pipeline.
7:50
Over a tenth said reductions could reach 15 to 30%.
7:54
Some said as much as 30 to 60%! What would the office look like? And
7:59
some of those managers went as far as saying they expected to lose 70% of their staff.
8:04
Bear in mind, these were predictions, but lay offs were already happening.
8:08
It’s coming. And it’s going to get ugly. This is the cold reality: if you don’t have
8:13
strong critical thinking and problem-solving skills, you’re competing with systems that can
8:17
already do more and more of the entry-level work. The good news? Only 7% of companies said they
8:23
were offering fewer jobs than in the past. This was mostly because of AI,
8:27
but also for financial reasons or because of a lack of faith in young graduates.
8:32
Companies now expect a lot more of their young workers. Internships are becoming a thing of the
8:36
past. Seven out of ten companies said AI could do the job of an intern. So, why bother with them?
8:43
But as you know, internships used to be one of the ways to get on the corporate ladder.
8:46
The World Economic Forum in March 2026 said over the previous 18 months,
8:51
entry-level jobs in the US had fallen by a staggering 35%. And that was mostly down to AI.
8:58
Cheap, reliable, obedient AI. And if Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei, is right,
9:04
50% of entry-level white collar jobs will be wiped out within the next few years. He warned that this
9:09
will bring “labor market displacement, and concentration of economic power.”
9:13
He thinks companies should “reassign employees… to stave off the need for layoffs.” The cozy human-AI
9:20
relationship in the workplace looks a lot more like humans being told to clean out their desks.
9:24
The British Standards Institution in 2025 polled 850 company bosses in Australia,
9:30
China, France, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the US. 41% said they’d already replaced
9:36
staff with AI. 43% said they were planning to get rid of more humans in the year ahead.
9:42
At the end of the day, it’s all about productivity and efficiency. The long-term consequences
9:46
of massive job displacement don’t seem to concern the companies doing the displacing.
9:51
Take Amazon, one of the biggest employers in the world with around 350,000 corporate staff
9:56
and a total global workforce of over 1.5 million. The New York Times reported that just in the US,
10:02
Amazon employs around 1.2 million people but it plans to replace a lot of those jobs.
10:08
The New York Times in 2025 reported that it had accessed internal documents that said the
10:13
company plans to eliminate or avoid hiring for approximately 600,000 roles by 2033.
10:19
AI is the reason. About 75% of Amazon’s operations will be automated.
10:25
It’s already started in the office. Last year, the company laid off 30,000
10:29
of its office staff. That followed 27,000 corporate staff laid off in 2023. By 2027,
10:35
Amazon’s automation technologies will mean 160,000 staff in all kinds of roles not being hired.
10:42
It estimates savings of around $12.6 billion. But that’s tens of thousands or eventually hundreds of
10:49
thousands of jobs down the drain of progress. And let’s not forget Mark Zuckerberg,
10:54
the man who only ever wanted to connect people with their loved ones.
10:58
In 2025, he laid off 5% of his staff. By April 2026, he laid off 100s more as his
11:05
company tried to recoup losses after mistakenly assuming people would want to spend all their
11:09
time in the Metaverse. It was a big bet.
11:13
One cost Meta an estimated $80 billion since 2021. The company has now turned to AI investment and
11:20
firing staff. According to Reuters, Zucks might layoff 20% of the Meta workforce in total. He’s
11:26
also throwing $135 billion at AI with a focus on superintelligence, the kind of AI that will
11:32
take away more entry-level jobs. The job-ocalypse is coming…
11:36
Whether you like it or not. Jack Dorsey knows. He recently
11:40
told shareholders he plans to lay off 4,000 of his 10,000 staff. He said that everyone else in tech
11:46
will do it, and he wants to be ahead of the curve. He’s right. In the cut-throat world of business,
11:51
if you lag behind, you go under. The so-called big four consultancy
11:54
firms – Deloitte, EY, PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG – have also jumped on the AI bandwagon.
12:01
Collectively, they posted 44% fewer jobs for graduates in 2025 compared with 2023.
12:07
PwC alone plans to cut US entry-level hiring by nearly one-third by 2028. The firm axed
12:14
5,600 jobs in 2024 and more axing will follow. It’s all happened so fast. In the olden days,
12:22
2021, PwC announced that in the next five years it planned to hire 100,000 new workers. Almost
12:30
the exact opposite happened. That shows how much things have changed in such a short time.
12:36
With outsourcing - and increasingly AI - entry-level jobs are becoming almost
12:40
obsolete. The few people who do get hired will need to bring their absolute A-game…
12:45
All while young people are constantly told they’re not ready for the corporate world.
12:49
But which jobs will go first? Recent estimates tell us 80% of
12:54
all call center work for common customer service enquiries will be automated with chatbots by 2029.
13:00
All the jobs that went from the West to Asia in the last 20 years won’t exist over there,
13:05
either. If they do, they’ll be few and far between as the call centers adopt the “hybrid” model,
13:10
where a human steps in when required. Who else is up for the AI Guillotine?
13:15
Clerical and administrative work will be gone. AI and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) are already
13:21
managing invoices, payroll, and basic bookkeeping. Humans will offer oversight, so they might work as
13:26
AI Verification Specialists, but it’s highly unlikely or near impossible that there will
13:32
be just as many overseers as there were staff. Some of the pundits are currently saying that jobs
13:37
will merely transform. For example, paralegals will just become much better when they have a
13:41
robot assistant. This is the “Augmentation” Argument, that says we won’t be replaced,
13:46
but will be given “superpowers.” The problem with this argument is
13:50
it is based on a lot of… well, guesswork. A member of Anthropic’s economic advisory
13:55
council said in an interview in The Atlantic that even the tech leaders don’t know what
14:00
will happen. He kind of said they were winging it. The same article said the same CEOs in 2025 would
14:06
openly talk about AIs effect on the job market. Now they’ve suddenly gone suspiciously quiet.
14:11
Realists say companies do what’s good for their revenue and their shareholders. What happens to
14:16
the populace is an “afterthought.” To be sure, politicians may have to introduce policies to
14:21
limit the carnage, but right now, there’s still no xxxword about what those policies might look like.
14:26
The one thing we do know is the entry-level jobs are already becoming the first to go.
14:31
Whether it’s engineering, basic coding, data entry, scheduling,
14:34
basic architecture, SEO-type marketing, or writing basic blogs, a computer will do it.
14:40
Routine. Rule-based. Digital. Low-risk. You should consider those jobs already gone.
14:46
To survive, you will need to not just have impressive cognitive skills and originality,
14:51
but also AI literacy. One, without the other, won’t work in this new demanding reality. But
14:56
this still doesn’t change the fact you can’t get your foot on the bottom rung of the ladder.
15:00
And it’s worse right now because Gen Z is having to scrap it out with all
15:04
the millennials who recently lost their jobs. They, too, are going for entry-level positions.
15:10
During the years of the pandemic, E-commerce expanded. Streaming surged. Remote work tools
15:15
advanced. In a nutshell, the digital world exploded as we all settled in for the new
15:19
normal. It was the era of The Great Reset where we would harness “the innovations of the Fourth
15:24
Industrial Revolution.” The problem is the
15:27
future that was envisaged didn’t arrive. As the Metaverse flopped, growth slowed down
15:31
and interest rates rose. Suddenly big firms were wheeling their chopping blocks into the office.
15:37
Growth turned into efficiency. Cut backs. Apologies and excuses. That left Millennials
15:41
out in the cold. Gen Z rose up in this storm of corporate chaos as Millennials were told
15:46
they were surplus to requirements. It should come as no surprise then,
15:50
that 43% of Gen Z workers are now participating in the gig economy. That’s a rough estimate. It’s
15:56
the same with Millennials. Depending on the source, either 38%, or 45%, or even up to 78%
16:02
of Millennials are now earning income from gigs. Some do it to supplement their income. Some love
16:07
the flexibility, but for many, it’s not a matter of choice. In 2024, the LA Times said 38% of
16:13
all Americans had hustled in the gig economy contributing $1.27 trillion to the economy.
16:20
The article suggested the government has a responsibility to make such work more sustainable.
16:25
Because right now, it’s not. There are very few protections for gig-workers.
16:30
So-called precarious work is becoming the norm. We are told that more people are at
16:34
risk of exploitation. What’s called the “hustle culture” doesn’t usually come with safety nets.
16:40
Workers can find themselves putting in 12-hour shifts, working multiple jobs, just to get by.
16:45
It’s one of the reasons so many are moving abroad. Young people, even middle-aged people,
16:49
are saying if they have to hustle, they’ll hustle where it works best for them.
16:53
In 2025, according to the Digital Nomad Forecast, 39% of Gen Z and Millennials
16:59
stated they were going to work abroad in the next year. As a writer on the
17:02
topic said, “Gen Z is fast becoming the most internationally mobile generation in history.”
17:08
One of the countries which had been hit the hardest is the UK, a country
17:11
where the media is talking about an “exodus.” The BBC cited the Office for National Statistics
17:17
(ONS) in 2025 when it said 195,000 people under the age of 35 had made the move abroad from the
17:25
start of the year to June. In another survey, 75% of young Brits said they’d consider leaving.
17:31
US data shows the numbers have been increasing in the US, too. According
17:35
to an article in Quartz citing recent data, the “new American dream is to leave America.”
17:41
A recent survey said that 17% of Americans are planning to leave and another 5% were
17:46
already on their way, each looking for a better quality of life. A poll revealed
17:50
England is one of the leading choices, and it looks like England could need them. Canada,
17:55
Italy and Australia were also favorites. Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Mexico, Spain, and Portugal
18:00
are also popular haunts for digital hustlers. So many young people leaving can lead to a brain
18:06
drain. Governments might not like it and may start putting pressure on other countries or emphasizing
18:11
the dangers and pitfalls of living abroad. But these are the effects of globalization.
18:16
It’s what hustling looks like when gainful employment at large companies is scarce. People
18:21
will go where they’re provided with the best life. But as the saying goes, the grass can look a lot
18:26
greener somewhere else. Living without safety nets and constant insecurity isn’t for everyone. That
18:31
said, western countries, especially the US and UK, are still hemorrhaging young
18:36
people… and it’s going to get a lot worse. A report said in 2023 there were about 35
18:41
million digital nomads with an estimated 18.1 million from the US. But by 2030,
18:47
it’s estimated there will be 60 million. If corporations had their own way,
18:51
they’d employ as few people as possible. The endgame is a billion dollar firm with a board
18:56
and some executives and a giant server farm of AI agents. Maximum productivity. Minimal costs.
19:03
That’s the future. They don’t need you. They don’t want you.
19:06
So if companies don’t need people anymore… where did all the jobs go? That’s exactly
19:11
what we break down in Why the US is Running Out of Jobs. Or click on this video instead.
