Hampstead Heath's ponds will stay trans-inclusive with better privacy for women.

Councillors support keeping the current access rules for the ponds, with more work planned. A final decision will be made on June 4.

A Corporation spokesperson said all options were informed by public consultation and expert advice.

Hampstead Heath has three ponds: one for ladies, one for men, and a mixed area. The ladies' pond is open to biological and trans women.

The Corporation said this policy has been in place since at least 2017, following the Equality Act 2010.

Hampstead Heath has three ponds: the Kenwood Ladies', Highgate Men's, and a mixed area.

After a Supreme Court ruling, members reviewed the existing policy.

A consultation showed most people wanted to keep the current access rules. Only 13% wanted single-sex spaces.

Some people questioned the consultation results. A charity is challenging the Corporation's policy in court.

The Local Democracy Reporting Service said Corporation officers recommended keeping the ponds trans-inclusive.

Officers said no incidents had been recorded since 2017, and strict segregation couldn't be justified.

A director said it's great news, but the government should protect inclusive spaces.

The director said it's ridiculous that public money will be spent defending the inclusive choice.

The government should ensure a clear legal framework to protect inclusive spaces.

Officers proposed improvements to the ponds, including better facilities, costing up to £1.08 million.

The report was discussed by a committee on May 5 and May 12.

An executive director outlined the proposed upgrades, including private changing areas.

The final funding and timeline are not confirmed, but the Corporation supports the proposals.

A councillor suggested considering broader issues, like lockers.

A councillor questioned whether the policy amendment could be agreed upon at this stage.

He proposed treating it as an in-principle decision that could be revisited.

Another councillor backed the recommended amendment, saying it would bring finality to the issue.

A councillor said he has faith that the design process will meet everyone's needs.

The City Solicitor said he was hesitant to intervene, but acknowledged pressure from a charity.

A councillor asked about the Equality and Human Rights Commission's Code of Practice.

He was told that the Government guidance is in draft form and carries little weight.

Members voted to approve the officers' recommendations, with one councillor abstaining.

The CEO of Sex Matters said the Corporation's proposed policy is unlawful.