Home
Entrar
Cadastrar
Prática de escuta
Prática de escuta
/
Video
/
CNBC International
/
Should AI Be Used in Warfare? "The Alternative Is Dumber Weapons"
Should AI Be Used in Warfare? "The Alternative Is Dumber Weapons"
Selecione o modo de aprendizagem:
Ver legendas
Escolher palavra
Reescrever palavra
Highlight:
3000 Oxford Words
4000 IELTS Words
5000 Oxford Words
3000 Common Words
1000 TOEIC Words
5000 TOEFL Words
Legendas (46)
0:00
When we talk about AI,
0:02
and autonomous weaponry, you know, what
0:04
exactly are we talking about from your
0:06
point of view?
0:06
>> Nobody wants the insane version of this.
0:10
Like nobody in the military is talking
0:11
about it. Nobody thinks it's a good
0:13
idea.
0:14
But the reality is we already have
0:16
lethal autonomous weapons. They exist.
0:18
So you think about like a torpedo. How
0:19
does a torpedo work? You say, here's a
0:22
region, and if anything looks like it
0:25
matches this acoustic signature in this
0:27
region, that's a military target. We've
0:29
anti-radiation weapons where the idea is
0:32
if I shoot a missile at an area, if it's
0:35
something is emitting in that area that
0:37
looks like a Russian radar, that's a
0:39
military target. So these have existed
0:41
since like the 1970s, right? This idea
0:44
that you're going to have machines in a
0:46
bounded way make decisions, but you know
0:48
what they're going to do. They're going
0:49
to be predictable,
0:51
and you can kind of constrain them in a
0:53
smart way. That's always been true. Like
0:54
that's been true for a very long time.
0:56
And AI enables you to make this more
0:59
precise, more discriminating, more
1:02
accurate. So, you know, the the the
1:04
counter view of well, we shouldn't have
1:05
AI in weapons to me is just a deeply
1:07
unethical view. Where you're saying, oh,
1:10
actually we should have dumber weapons.
1:11
We should have weapons that don't make
1:13
smart decisions. You're like, well, that
1:14
that seems like a strictly worse world
1:16
to live in. But you want to put the
1:18
right bounds on it, right? And you want
1:19
to say these things are still controlled
1:22
by accountable people, and we still have
1:25
the mechanisms to say these are
1:26
predictable, where they're tested, we
1:28
know what they're going to do. They just
1:31
are smarter.
