A new law may help those who take risks to do good.

The Minister of Public Security has proposed a new law to protect people who think and act for the common good.

The law aims to help dynamic and innovative people who take bold actions.

It suggests using economic and administrative measures before considering criminal penalties.

Acts involving corruption or self-interest are not included.

The new law is important because it shows the state wants to protect businesses and entrepreneurs.

Business owners are changing their mindset.

Business owners worry about legal risks.

A grocery store owner closed her shop due to strict tax rules.

The owner was afraid of being fined because she couldn't get proper invoices.

A beer restaurant owner reduced his business due to the same issue.

Both owners decided to scale back because they couldn't comply with the new rules.

Such stories are no longer rare.

A survey found that many household businesses face legal difficulties.

Many businesses are scaling down or suspending operations due to lack of confidence.

Similar concerns are emerging among registered enterprises.

There have been many reports of companies accused of breaking the law.

Businesses are wondering where the line is between a risky decision and a legal violation.

The biggest concern among businesses is legal risk.

Legal risk is a hidden cost that can change investment decisions.

A report found many legal obstacles reported by businesses.

Legal risk is a persistent concern for Vietnamese businesses.

The line between business risk and breaking the law is unclear.

The private sector can drive growth if entrepreneurs can take risks.

Not every failed project is a mistake or a crime.

When the boundary between risk and law is unclear, entrepreneurs postpone investment.

The law must distinguish between deliberate deception and ordinary business risks.

Entrepreneurs need confidence that business failure won't be equated with crime.

A draft resolution aims to find an answer to these concerns.

The proposal follows a broader policy adjustment process.

Resolution 68 identified the private sector as a key growth engine.

Conclusion 56 called for changes to criminal policy in the economic sphere.

The latest draft resolution is the next step in translating policy into practice.

Experts are concerned about the impact of criminal cases on businesses.

Economist Pham Chi Lan said dishonest businesses must be removed from the market.

But she argued that the entire business community shouldn't be viewed through the lens of criminal cases.

Most businesses operate legitimately and contribute to society.

Those that break the law are just a few bad apples.

Nguyen Dinh Cung is cautious when discussing individual cases.

He believes the entrepreneurial spirit needs to be encouraged.

Businesses need confidence to act.

The draft resolution proposes not to pursue criminal liability in certain cases.

The mechanism wouldn't apply to corruption or self-interest.

The goal is to uphold the law without obstructing investment and business activities.

The draft resolution aims to clarify the line between criminal conduct and ordinary business risks.

A transparent and predictable legal environment is needed for entrepreneurs to take risks.

Tu Giang