Logo
Home
language
Chính sách quyền riêng tư·Điều khoản dịch vụ
Trang chủTừ vựngĐọc & NgheIELTS

Luyện đọc

Closed, Invitation‑Only Grants Paved the Way for a $6 Million Promise to Marrickville Golf Club
Xã hội · C1 · 2 phút đọc

Closed, Invitation‑Only Grants Paved the Way for a $6 Million Promise to Marrickville Golf Club

Golf Club Marrickville: Từ trợ cấp kín đáo đến lời hứa 6 triệu USD

Nguồn: ABC

The club received five separate federal allocations between 2019 and 2022 – $21,450 for toilet and locker upgrades, $11,000 for a computer system, $12,650 for energy‑saving downlights, $3,410 for flame‑tree planting and a commemorative plaque, and $9,350 for course‑side benches – all classified as closed, non‑competitive grants and awarded after local members of parliament nominated the project through invitation‑only processes.

Three of those grants were dispensed under the former Coalition government while the club lay within the federal electorate of Linda Burney, whose seat the local MP was instructed to identify as worthy of financial support, illustrating how party affiliation can intersect with grant nomination procedures.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who holds an undisclosed honorary membership to the Marrickville Golf Club, subsequently promised a $6 million redevelopment package at the 2025 federal election, a commitment he later defended by claiming ignorance of his own club membership.

Constitutional lawyer Anne Twomey, in a submission to the Senate inquiry, characterised the earlier allocations as “gifts of political largesse”, emphasizing that the closed nature of the grants precluded any merit‑based assessment of need or value for money.

A Senate inquiry into invitation‑only grant funding is slated to commence later this month, aiming to scrutinise the mechanisms by which projects are identified and to determine whether conflicts of interest have influenced the distribution of public money.

The episode underscores how nomination‑driven, non‑competitive grant schemes can enable politicians to channel taxpayer funds to favoured entities without transparent evaluation, raising profound questions about accountability and the integrity of public‑fund allocation.

Bạn đã đọc xong bài này

Từ trong bài này

12 từ gợi ý · 0 từ đã tra

Từ gợi ý

Từ bạn đã tra

Bạn chưa tra từ nào trong bài này.

Luyện tập bài này

Luyện tập

Đọc tiếp

  • Why Thuan An Ward Stops New Tombs
    Latest NewsXã hội · A2 · 1 phút đọc

    Why Thuan An Ward Stops New Tombs

    Vì sao phường Thuận An cấm xây mộ mới

  • Standardized Exams for Grades 5, 9 and 12: What It Means for Students, Teachers and Schools
    Latest NewsGiáo dục · B1 · 2 phút đọc

    Standardized Exams for Grades 5, 9 and 12: What It Means for Students, Teachers and Schools

    Kỳ thi cuối kỳ thống nhất cho lớp 5, 9 và 12: Tác động đến học sinh, giáo viên và nhà trường

  • Ho Chi Minh City Uses Fireworks and 3D Mapping to Celebrate Vietnam Culture Day
    Latest NewsXã hội · B1 · 1 phút đọc

    Ho Chi Minh City Uses Fireworks and 3D Mapping to Celebrate Vietnam Culture Day

    TP.HCM bắn pháo hoa, trình chiếu 3D mừng Ngày Văn hóa Việt Nam

0:000:00